On March 1, social media erupted as rumors of the State House staff’s weekly fasting requirements spread.
The new policies, which took effect on Wednesday, prohibited personnel from bringing food onto the premises and prohibited the provision of food.
It was questioned whether prayer points would be available at the State House and whether the prayers would be guided.
Some questioned whether the adjustments would be made regardless of the staff members’ religion.
Social media users debated the reports, with some claiming that it had previously occurred in Karen, Nairobi, when President William Ruto was the Deputy President.
Kenyans online expressed their views on the subject, saying that people should be allowed to practice their religion as they see fit rather than having it forced upon them.
“Those arguing that this used to happen in Karen when Ruto was DP so we should not complain now because we did not complain then, an injustice is an injustice and it doesn’t matter the time it is addressed.
“Forcing public servants to fast is an illegality. It is unconstitutional. This is not even fasting. It’s withdrawing people’s right to eat,” digital communication strategist Pauline Njoroge stated.
“Those who have been asked to fast are not complaining while those who have not been asked are complaining on their behalf,” read Kennedy Owino’s post.
“Fasting is not necessarily Christian. Maybe it is for purposes of discipline and focus. Offices enforce several rituals like these,” Arwa Erick noted.
“Let people pray and fast. If the president is fasting why not the employees,” a user identified as Kim pointed out.
